Bhikkhu Bodhi: Message for a Globalized World

by Bhikkhu Bodhi

Over the past three decades the world has been dramatically transformed in ways that none but a handful of prophets and visionaries could have foreseen even a hundred years ago. From a multitude of loosely connected nation-states it has quickly evolved into a tightly knit global community linked together by rapid means of transportation and instantaneous media of communication. Old barriers of space and time have dropped away, confronting us with new vistas of self-understanding and forcing us to recognize the hard truth that we all face a common human destiny. The claims to special privilege of a particular people, nation, race, or religion now sound hollow. As occupants of the same planet — a bright blue jewel suspended in the frigid blackness of infinite space — we either flourish together or perish together. In the long run between these two alternatives no middle ground is feasible.

But while our proud technology has enabled us to split the atom and unscramble genetic codes, the daily newspapers remind us that our mastery over the external world has not ushered in the utopia that we had so confidently anticipated. To the contrary, the shrinking of global boundaries has given rise to fresh problems of enormous scope — social, political, and psychological problems so grave that they throw into question the continued survival of our planet and our race. The problems that challenge the global community today are legion. They include the depletion of the earth’s natural resources and the despoliation of the environment; regional tensions of ethnic and religious character; the continuing spread of nuclear weapons; disregard for human rights; the widening gap between the rich and the poor. While such problems have been extensively discussed from social, political, and economic points of view, they also cry out for critical examination from a religious viewpoint as well.

A spiritually sensitive mind would not look upon these problems as isolated phenomena to be treated by piecemeal solutions, but would insist on probing into unexplored areas for hidden roots and subtle interconnections. From such a perspective, what is most striking when we reflect upon our global ailments as a whole is their essentially symptomatic character. Beneath their outward diversity they appear to be so many manifestations of a common root, of a deep and hidden spiritual malignancy infecting our social organism. This common root might be briefly characterized as a stubborn insistence on placing short-term, narrowly considered self-interests (including the interests of the limited social or ethnic groups to which we happen to belong) above the long-range, vital good of the broader human community. The multitude of social ills that assail us cannot be adequately accounted for without bringing into view the powerful human drives that lie behind them. And what is distinctive about these drives is that they derive from a pernicious distortion in the functioning of the human mind which sends us blindly in pursuit of factional, divisive, circumscribed ends even when such pursuits threaten to be ultimately self-destructive.

The most valuable contribution that the Buddha’s teaching can make to helping us resolve the great dilemmas facing us today is twofold: first, its uncompromisingly realistic analysis of the psychological springs of human suffering, and second, the ethically ennobling discipline it proposes as the solution. The Buddha explains that the hidden springs of human suffering, in both the personal and social dimensions of our lives, consist of three mental factors called the unwholesome roots. These three roots — which may be regarded as the three prongs of the ego-consciousness — are greed, hatred, and delusion. The aim of the Buddhist spiritual path is to gradually subdue these three evil roots by cultivating the mental factors that are directly opposed to them. These are the three wholesome roots, namely: non-greed, which is expressed as generosity, detachment, and contentment; non-hatred, which becomes manifested as loving-kindness, compassion, patience, and forgiveness; and non-delusion, which arises as wisdom, insight, and understanding.

If we contemplate, in the light of the Buddhist analysis, the dangers that hang over us in our globalized world order, it will become clear that they have assumed such precarious proportions due to the unrestrained proliferation of greed, hatred, and delusion as the basis of human conduct. It is not that these dark forces of the mind were first awakened with the Industrial Revolution; they have indeed been the deep springs of so much suffering and destructiveness since time immemorial. But the one-sided development of humankind — the development of outward control over nature, coupled with the almost complete neglect of any attempts to achieve self-understanding — has today given the unwholesome roots an awesome, unprecedented power that veers ever closer to the catastrophic.

Through the prevalence of greed the world has become transformed into a global marketplace where human beings are reduced to the status of consumers, even commodities, and where materialistic desires are provoked at volatile intensities. Through the prevalence of hatred, which is often kindled by competing interests governed by greed, national and ethnic differences become the breeding ground of suspicion and enmity, exploding in violence and destruction, in cruelty and brutality, in endless cycles of revenge. Delusion sustains the other two unwholesome roots by giving rise to false beliefs, dogmatic views, and philosophical ideologies devised in order to promote and justify patterns of conduct motivated by greed and hatred.

In the new era marked by the triumph of the free-market economy the most pernicious delusion that hangs over us is the belief that the path to human fulfillment lies in the satisfaction of artificially induced desires. Such a project can only provoke more and more greed leading to more and more reckless degrees of selfishness, and from the clash of self-seeking factions, the result will necessarily be strife and violence. If there is any validity in the Buddhist diagnosis of the human situation, the task incumbent on humankind today is clear. The entire drive of contemporary civilization has been towards the conquest and mastery of the external world. Science probes ever more deeply into the hidden secrets of matter and life, while technology and industry join hands to harness the discoveries of science for their practical applications. No doubt science and technology have made appreciable contributions towards alleviating human misery and have vastly improved the quality of our lives. Yet because the human mind, the ultimate agent behind all the monumental achievements of science, has pitifully neglected itself, our patterns of perception, motivations, and drives still move in the same dark channels in which they moved in earlier centuries — the channels of greed, hatred, and delusion — only now equipped with more powerful instruments of destruction.

As long as we continue to shirk the task of turning our attention within, towards the understanding and mastery of our own minds, our impressive accomplishments in the external sphere will fail to yield their proper fruits. While at one level they may make life safer and more comfortable, at another they will spawn baneful consequences of increasing severity and peril, even despite our best intentions. For the human race to flourish in the global age, and to live together happily and peacefully on this shrinking planet, the inescapable challenge facing us is that of coming to understand and transform ourselves.

It is here that the Buddha’s Teaching becomes especially timely, even for those who are not prepared to embrace the full range of Buddhist religious faith and philosophical doctrine. In its diagnosis of greed, hatred, and delusion as the underlying causes of human suffering, the Buddha-Dhamma enables us to see the hidden roots of our private and collective predicaments. By defining a practical path of training which helps us to remove what is harmful and to foster the growth of what is beneficial, the Teaching offers us an effective remedy for tackling the problems of the globe in the one place where they are directly accessible to us: in our own minds. Because it places the burden of responsibility for our redemption on ourselves, calling for personal effort and energetic application to the taming of the mind, the Buddha’s Teaching will inevitably have a bitter edge. But by providing an acute diagnosis of our illness and a precise path to deliverance, it also offers us in this global era an elevating message of hope.

Buddhist Publication Society Newsletter cover essay #34 (3rd mailing, 1996)
Copyright © 1996 Buddhist Publication Society
For free distribution only

DAILY NATION - Rich nations buying huge tracts of land in Africa to grow crops

Sunday, November 23, 2008

By PAUL REDFERN, NATION CorrespondentPosted Sunday, November 23 2008 at 14:00

LONDON, Sunday - Rich nations are buying up huge tracts of land across sub Saharan Africa to grow food or bio fuels for the future according to new evidence from the United Nations Food and Agriculture organisation.

Following reports in Saturday Nation that some rich westerners were buying up some of the best stretches of Kenya’s coastline to build multi-million pound villas comes the news that it is not only prime coastal areas that are attracting western interest

According to the head of the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, Jacques Diouf, a number of the western governments and corporations are buying up the rights to millions of hectares of agricultural land in developing countries in an effort to secure their own long-term food supplies.

Mr Diouf has warned that the controversial rise in land deals could create a form of “neo-colonialism”, with poor states producing food for the rich at the expense of their own hungry people.

The UK newspaper the Guardian said that the escalating cost of the world’s food prices had already set off a second “scramble for Africa”.
This week, the South Korean firm Daewoo Logistics announced plans to buy a 99-year lease on a million hectares in Madagascar.

Its aim is to grow 5m tonnes of corn a year by 2023, and produce palm oil from a further lease of 120,000 hectares (296,000 acres), relying on a largely South African workforce. Production would be mainly earmarked for South Korea, which wants to lessen dependence on imports.

“These deals can be purely commercial ventures on one level, but sitting behind it is often a food security imperative backed by a government,” Carl Atkin, a consultant at Bidwells Agribusiness, a Cambridge firm helping to arrange some of the big international land deals told the Guardian.

Madagascar’s government said that an environmental impact assessment would have to be carried out before the Daewoo deal could be approved, but it welcomed the investment. The massive lease is the largest so far in an accelerating number of land deals that have been arranged since the surge in food prices late last year.

“In the context of arable land sales, this is unprecedented,” Atkin said. “We’re used to seeing 100,000-hectare sales. This is more than 10 times as much.”

At a food security summit in Rome, in June, there was agreement to channel more investment and development aid to African farmers to help them respond to higher prices by producing more. But governments and corporations in some cash-rich but land-poor states have opted not to wait for world markets to respond and are trying to guarantee their own long-term access to food by buying up land in poorer countries.

At present the buy-up has generally have been welcomed by sellers in developing world governments desperate for capital in a recession with Madagascar’s land reform minister saying revenue would go to infrastructure and development in flood-prone areas.

Sudan also is trying to attract investors for almost 900,000 hectares of its land, and the Ethiopian prime minister, Meles Zenawi, has been courting would-be Saudi investors.

Huge tracts of land in Tanzania have also attracted interest from western companies interested in growing bio-fuels.

“If this was a negotiation between equals, it could be a good thing. It could bring investment, stable prices and predictability to the market,” said Duncan Green, Oxfam’s head of research. “But the problem is, [in] this scramble for soil I don’t see any place for the small farmers.”

Alex Evans, at the Centre on International Cooperation, at New York University, said: “The small farmers are losing out already. People without solid title are likely to be turfed off the land.”

Details of land deals have generally been kept secret so it is unknown whether they have built-in safeguards for local populations.

Steve Wiggins, a rural development expert at the UK-based Overseas Development Institute, said: “There are very few economies of scale in most agriculture above the level of family farm because managing [the] labour is extremely difficult.”

Investors might also have to contend with hostility. “If I was a political-risk adviser to [investors] I’d say ‘you are taking a very big risk’. Land is an extremely sensitive thing. This could go horribly wrong if you don’t learn the lessons of history.”

BBC NEWS | Country profile: Sri Lanka

Nestling off the southern tip of India, the tropical island of Sri Lanka has beguiled travellers for centuries with its palm-fringed beaches, diverse landscapes and historical monuments.

But for nearly two decades, the island was scarred by a bitter civil war arising out of ethnic tensions. A ceasefire was signed in 2002, but it was undermined by regular clashes between government troops and Tamil rebels, and in January 2008 it expired.

Known as “Serendip” to Arab geographers, the island fell under Portuguese and Dutch influence and finally came under British rule when it was called Ceylon.

NATION AT WAR
Army and Tamil separatists are engaged in conflict involving air raids, roadside blasts, suicide bombings, land and sea battles
More than 50,000 killed
1983 - start of war
2002 - ceasefire is signed but violence escalates in 2006

There is a long-established Tamil minority in the north and east. The British also brought in Tamil labourers to work the coffee and tea plantations in the central highlands, making the island a major tea producer.

But the majority Buddhist Sinhalese community resented what they saw as favouritism towards the mainly-Hindu Tamils under British administration.

The growth of a more assertive Sinhala nationalism after independence fanned the flames of ethnic division until civil war erupted in the 1980s between Tamils pressing for self-rule and the government.

Most of the fighting took place in the north. But the conflict also penetrated the heart of Sri Lankan society with Tamil Tiger rebels carrying out devastating suicide bombings in Colombo in the 1990s.

The violence killed more than 60,000 people, damaged the economy and harmed tourism in one of South Asia’s potentially prosperous societies.

A ceasefire and a political agreement reached between the government and rebels in late 2002 raised hopes for a lasting settlement. But Norwegian-brokered peace talks have stalled and monitors reported open violations of the truce by the government and Tamil Tiger rebels.

Escalating violence between the two sides in 2006 killed hundreds of people and raised fears of a return to all-out war. In January 2008, the government said it was withdrawing from the 2002 ceasefire agreement. The ceasefire expired a fortnight later.

Sri Lanka suffered its worst disaster in late 2004 when giant waves generated by an undersea earthquake off Indonesia swept ashore, killing more than 30,000 people and devasting swathes of the coast.

* Full name: Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
* Population: 19.3 million (UN, 2007)
* Capital: Colombo (commercial), Sri Jayawardenepura (administrative)
* Largest city: Colombo
* Area: 65,610 sq km (25,332 sq miles)
* Major languages: Sinhala, Tamil, English
* Major religions: Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity
* Life expectancy: 69 years (men), 76 years (women) (UN)
* Monetary unit: Sri Lankan rupee
* Main exports: Clothing and textiles, tea, gems, rubber, coconuts
* GNI per capita: US $1,540 (World Bank, 2007)
* Internet domain: .lk
* International dialling code: +94

President: Mahinda Rajapakse

Mahinda Rajapakse, prime minister at the time of his election, won the November 2005 presidential poll by a narrow margin. His main rival was the opposition leader Ranil Wickremesinghe.

Mr Rajapakse was backed by Marxist and Buddhist parties in the government. He also benefited from an extremely low turnout by Tamils in the north and east.

But he inherited a troubled economy and a faltering peace process. During campaigning he promised to take a hard line in any peace talks with Tamil Tiger rebels and said he would seek direct talks with the group’s leader.

He says the solution to the conflict lies in a unitary state.

Mr Rajapakse, a Buddhist lawyer, became prime minister in 2004, heading a heavily-polarised parliament.

He served under Chandrika Bandaranaike-Kumaratunga, president since 1994. She had backed economic liberalisation while in office but government rifts slowed the pace of change.

Mrs Bandaranaike-Kumaratunga’s coalition was also divided over the Tamil peace process. The former president pursued a twin-track approach during the civil war, trying to offer the Tamil rebels some form of autonomy while seeking the upper hand on the battlefield.

However, she accused the government of making too many concessions to the rebels and tensions over the peace process led to a bitter power struggle with the then prime minister, Ranil Wickramasinghe, in 2003.

The Sri Lankan president can appoint and dismiss the prime minister, and can dissolve parliament.

Media outlets are divided along linguistic and ethnic lines, with state-run and private operators offering services in the main languages.

Many of the main broadcasters and publications are state-owned, including two major TV stations, radio networks operated by the Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation (SLBC), and newspapers in Sinhala, Tamil and English.

There are more than a dozen private radio stations, and eight privately-run TV stations. Sri Lanka’s privately-owned press and broadcasters often engage in political debate, and criticise government policies.

In 2002, against the background of the peace process, the government allowed Tamil Tiger rebels to begin FM broadcasts of their Voice of Tigers radio station in the north. Broadcasts had previously operated on a clandestine basis. The station was targeted in a bombing raid by the Sri Lankan air force in late 2007.

Media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders says the press come under pressure from the authorities, while the Tamil Tigers “allow no dissident voices” in the areas they control.

The internet is a growing medium for news; many papers have online editions. There were 428,000 internet users by August 2007 according to world telecoms body, the ITU.

Press

* Daily News - state-owned, English-language daily
* The Island - private, English-language daily
* Daily Mirror - private, English-language daily
* Dinamina - state-owned, Sinhala daily
* Lankadeepa - private, Sinhala daily
* Lakbima - private, Sinhala daily
* Uthayan - private, Tamil daily
* Virakesari - private, Tamil daily

Television

* Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation (SLRC) - state-owned, operates two channels: Rupavahini and Channel Eye
* Independent Television Network (ITN) - state-run, Sri Lanka’s first TV station
* Sirasa TV - private, Sinhala
* MTV (Maharaj TV) - private, English-language
* TNL - private, English-language
* ART TV - private
* ETV - private
* Swarnavahini - private, Sinhala
* Shakthi TV - private, Tamil

Radio

* Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation (SLBC) - state-owned, operates domestic services in Sinhala, Tamil and English, including widely-listened-to Commercial Service
* TNL Rocks - private, English-language
* Sun FM - private, English-language
* Yes FM - private, English-language
* Sirasa FM - private, Sinhala
* Shree FM - private, Sinhala
* Sooriyan FM - private, Tamil
* Shakthi FM - private, Tamil

News agencies

* Lankapuvath - state-owned
* TamilNet - Tamil news service

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/country_profiles/1168427.stm

Published: 2008/10/28 16:40:58 GMT

© BBC MMVIII

The News Tribune - Children separated from parents by Congo violence

Tacoma, WA
By ANITA POWELL
Last updated: November 13th, 2008 01:57 PM (PST)<br />
Rebecca Nyiringindi scanned the sprawling refugee camp in eastern Congo, searching for just one person among the thousands of hungry and homeless.

“My mother’s name is Alphonsine,” the 10-year-old said softly, sucking her thumb. “She’s short. She’s very dark.”

Rebecca was among more than 150 children searching for their parents Thursday in a camp in Kibati, just miles from where soldiers and Tutsi rebels guarded a tense front line, raising fears that fighting would resume in this mineral-rich region.

Some 70,000 refugees have fled to Kibati since fighting intensified in eastern Congo in August, displacing at least 250,000 people despite the presence of the largest U.N. peacekeeping force in the world.

Aid agencies took advantage of a lull in fighting this week to return to camps near the front line and resume registering children who were separated from their parents during the conflict in Congo’s North Kivu province.

Some were clearly traumatized. Zawadi Bunzigiye, 6, stared down at her grubby blue dress and said, in a voice barely above a whisper, “I’m afraid of bullets.”

Many children fled with only the clothes on their backs. When fighting erupted Oct. 27 in the rebel-controlled town of Kibumba, about 12 miles from the camp, Rebecca said she fled on foot, accompanied only by the family’s goat.

“But I lost it,” she said. “It was a chocolate-colored goat. It was a big goat.”

She said her parents sent her to the camp, believing she’d be safer there.

“The military came in. I was afraid,” she said. “I hid next to the radio tower. My parents said, ‘Go, we’ll come after you.’ I went along the road and I didn’t see them again.”

There are no schools in the camp, and young children run underfoot all day, dodging waves of new arrivals. At night, say residents speaking in fearful whispers, drunk soldiers rampage through, raping women and girls.

Neema Maombi, 8, fled the northern town of Nyanzale, about 60 miles from the provincial capital of Goma, in early September with her sister Solange, 16. Her account of being caught in this complicated conflict is simple.

“I heard bullets,” she said. “I ran.”

Asked to describe her parents, the child plucked at her tattered blue shirt and said: “My mother is small. My father is short.”

“My mother makes good food, like potatoes and beans,” she added with a shy smile. “She makes banana beer.”

UNICEF says hundreds of children have been separated from their families since fighting flared in August, and that overall more than 1,600 children in the province are seeking their parents. Just 17 have been reunited with their families in the last three days in Kibati.

Those who have not are taken in by other families - and they wait.

“Children who are separated are particularly vulnerable to abuse, exploitation, violence and recruitment into armed groups,” said UNICEF spokesman Jaya Murthy.

The youngest child registered at Kibati is 3 and the oldest 17, according to Save the Children.

Their young ages and inability to give detailed information - plus the lack of official records in the Congolese countryside - make it even more difficult to track down the children’s families.

“We’re doing everything possible to find the families of these children,” Murthy said. “But we’re talking about tens of thousands of people who have fled. It’s just not that easy to find where these people have gone.”

Aid workers said they plan to take photos of the children and post them at the camp to try to help them reunite with their families.

Congo’s conflict has been fueled by festering hatreds left over from the 1994 Rwandan genocide in which half a million Tutsis were killed. More than a million Hutu extremists who participated in the slaughter fled Rwanda for the safety of Congo.

Rebel leader Laurent Nkunda, an ethnic Tutsi, accuses the Congolese government of not doing enough to protect minority Tutsis from the Hutu militias. A corrupt and ineffective government, and rival claims to the country’s vast mineral resources, have fanned the violence.

Aid agencies say they are concerned about the children’s vulnerability to malnutrition and disease.

Squatting by a muddy stream Thursday, a young boy used a plastic bag to draw water, then drank the opaque contents. Downstream, other children played in the murky water.

A girl walked by, hunched over with a jerry can of water in one hand, one strapped to her back and another balanced on her head. Nearby another girl, no more than 3 years old, wandered among strangers, her filthy green dress slipping off her left shoulder. Camp occupants said they did not know where her parents were.

A drunken Congolese soldier who appeared to have taken up residence in the camp despite aid agencies’ refusal to assist combatants staggered forward, his two rifles akimbo. He demanded food and money from a reporter.

The little girl looked around and whimpered. He yelled at her to stop, and she started to scream.

Originally published: November 13th, 2008 12:12 PM (PST)
1950 South State Street, Tacoma, Washington 98405 253-597-8742
© Copyright 2008 Tacoma News, Inc. A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

by Anup Shah

Introduction

What does it mean to be poor? How is poverty measured? Third World countries are often described as “developing” while the First World, industrialized nations are often “developed”. What does it mean to describe a nation as “developing”? A lack of material wealth does not necessarily mean that one is deprived. A strong economy in a developed nation doesn’t mean much when a significant percentage (even a majority) of the population is struggling to survive.

Successful development can imply many things, such as (though not limited to):

  • An improvement in living standards and access to all basic needs such that a person has enough food, water, shelter, clothing, health, education, etc;
  • A stable political, social and economic environment, with associated political, social and economic freedoms, such as (though not limited to) equitable ownership of land and property;
  • The ability to make free and informed choices that are not coerced;
  • Be able to participate in a democratic environment with the ability to have a say in one’s own future;
  • To have the full potential for what the United Nations calls Human Development:

    Human development is about much more than the rise or fall of national incomes. It is about creating an environment in which people can develop their full potential and lead productive, creative lives in accord with their needs and interests. People are the real wealth of nations. Development is thus about expanding the choices people have to lead lives that they value. And it is thus about much more than economic growth, which is only a means—if a very important one—of enlarging people’s choices.

    What is Human Development?, Human Development Reports, United Nations Development Program

To print all information e.g. expanded side notes, shows alternative links, use the print version:
http://www.globalissues.org/print/article/4

Global Financial Crisis 2008 —  Global Issues

* by Anup Shah

The global financial crisis, brewing for a while, really started to show its effects in the middle of 2008. Around the world stock markets have fallen, large financial institutions have collapsed or been bought out, and governments in even the wealthiest nations have had to come up with rescue packages to bail out their financial systems.

On the one hand many people are concerned that those responsible for the financial problems are the ones being bailed out, while on the other hand, a global financial meltdown will affect the livelihoods of almost everyone in an increasingly inter-connected world. The problem could have been avoided, if ideologues supporting the current economics models weren’t so vocal, influential and inconsiderate of others’ viewpoints and concerns.

This article provides an overview of the crisis with links for further, more detailed, coverage at the end.

Click on link below for full report.

Anup Shah, Global Financial Crisis 2008, GlobalIssues.org, Last updated: Wednesday, October 29, 2008

FactCheck.org: Do 40 percent of Americans pay no taxes?

About 38 percent of households have zero or negative income tax liability, but they pay other federal taxes.
Towards the end of the campaign, John McCain and prominent conservatives like Lou Dobbs claimed that Barack Obama’s proposed tax plan would amount to welfare because it offered a tax credit to the 40 percent of Americans who pay no taxes. We’ve already looked into the claims that Obama’s tax plan is a welfare handout (in short, it’s primarily a matter of how you define “welfare,” but Obama’s plan doesn’t look any more like welfare than McCain’s). But what about that 40 percent with no tax liability? Can it really be true that more than a third of the country pays no taxes at all?

According to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, it is true that 38 percent of “tax units” — which can be singles, couples, or families — are projected to have zero or negative income tax liability in 2009. About 60 percent of these households make $20,000 per year or less.

However, being exempt from income tax does not mean you’re exempt from federal taxes. Everyone who works is liable for payroll taxes, contributions to Medicare and Social Security that come out of every paycheck. There are also excise taxes on some goods and services, most notably the 18.4 cents per gallon tax on gasoline. The Congressional Budget Office found that earners in the lowest quintile, where most of those with no income tax liability fall, shouldered 4.3 percent of the payroll tax burden in 2005 and 11.1 percent of the excise taxes. Their effective tax rate (which is calculated by dividing taxes paid by total income) in those categories, according to the CBO, was in fact significantly higher than the rate of the top quintile, although that top one-fifth of the population had a much higher effective tax rate for individual and corporate income taxes.

-Jess Henig

Sources
Congressional Budget Office. “Historical Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979 to 2005.” Dec. 2007.

Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “Distribution of Tax Units With Zero or Negative Income Tax Liability by Cash Income Level, 2009.” 15 Aug. 2008.

Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
FactCheck.org’s staff, not the Annenberg Center, is responsible for this material.

VOA News - Zimbabwe Opposition Refuses to Join Unity Government

By Peter Clottey
Washington, D.C.
13 November 2008

Clottey Interview With George Mkwananzi - Download (MP3) audio clip
Clottey Interview With George Mkwananzi - Listen (MP3) audio clip

Zimbabwe’s main opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) is rejecting calls from President Robert Mugabe’s ruling ZANU-PF party to form a unity government. The MDC contends that it would only consider being part of a unity government with the ruling party after the disputes over the power-sharing agreement are amicably resolved. This comes after the ruling party vowed Wednesday immediately to form a unity government despite stiff opposition from the MDC. Political analyst George Mkwananzi tells reporter Peter Clottey that the opposition is right in refusing to dance to Robert Mugabe’s music.

“I believe that the action of the MDC is quite legitimate being the party that did everything within its purview to allow a solution to come out of a negotiated settlement. And then was betrayed by SADC (Southern African Development Community), betrayed by their African brothers in that has urged that they (MDC) must go and work with Mugabe regardless of complaints that the power-sharing has not been equitable. So we cannot blame them for that,” Mkwananzi noted.

He described the ruling party’s move to form a unity government despite the opposition’s apprehension as unfortunate.

“For the Robert Mugabe regime to continue to cling to power when they know the people have rejected them as they are now being brought back through the back door is completely unacceptable,” he said.

Mkwananzi said although Zimbabweans would be adversely affected if the main opposition fails to be part of the unity government, it would be for a good cause.

“Obviously, the people of Zimbabwe would suffer and they would continue to be subjected to conditions of abject poverty and starvation. However, sometimes it is necessary for people to Read the rest of this entry »

CorpWatch : Public Ownership — But No Public Control

Posted by Rob Weissman on October 21st, 2008

Originally posted Tuesday, October 14. 2008 — It is an extraordinary time. On Friday, the Washington Post ran a front-page story titled, “The End of American Capitalism?” Today, the banner headline is, “U.S. Forces Nine Major Banks to Accept Partial Nationalization.”
There’s no question that this morning’s announcement from the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is remarkable.

It was also necessary.

Over the next several months, we’re going to see a lot more moves like this. Government interventions in the economy that seemed unfathomable a few months ago are going to become the norm, as it quickly becomes apparent that, as Margaret Thatcher once said in a very different context, there is no alternative.

That’s because the U.S. and global economic problems are deep and pervasive. The American worker may be strong, as John McCain would have it, but the “fundamentals” of the U.S. and world economy are not. The underlying problem is a deflating U.S. housing market that still has much more to go. And underlying that problem are the intertwined problems of U.S. consumer over-reliance on debt, national and global wealth inequality of historic proportions, and massive global trade imbalances.

Although it was enabled by deregulation, the financial meltdown merely reflects these more profound underlying problems. It is, one might say, “derivative.”

Nonetheless, the financial crisis was — and conceivably still might be — by itself enough to crash the global economy.

Today, following the lead of the Great Britain, the United States has announced what has emerged as the consensus favored financial proposal among economists of diverse political ideologies. The United States will buy $250 billion in new shares in banks (the so-called “equity injection”). This is aimed at boosting confidence in the banks, and giving them new capital to loan. The new equity will enable them to loan roughly 10 times more than would the Treasury’s earlier (and still developing) plan to buy up troubled assets. The FDIC will offer new insurance programs for bank small business and other bank deposits, to stem bank runs. The FDIC will provide new, temporary insurance for interbank loans, intended to overcome the crisis of confidence between banks. And, the Federal Reserve will if necessary purchase commercial paper from business — the 3-month loans they use to finance day-to-day operations. This move is intended to overcome the unwillingness of money market funds and others to extend credit.

But while aggressive by the standards of two months ago, the most high-profile of these moves — government acquisition of shares in the private banking system — is a strange kind of “partial nationalization,” if it should be called that at all.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson effectively compelled the leading U.S. banks to accept participation in the program. And, at first blush, he may have done an OK job of protecting taxpayer monetary interests. The U.S. government will buy preferred shares in the banks, paying Read the rest of this entry »

India and conflict in Sri Lanka

India and conflict in Sri Lanka
By DR RASHID AHMAD KHAN submitted 1 day 1 hour ago

AS the armed forces of Sri Lanka in their current offensive close in on the last stronghold of (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam) LTTE, feelings of unease and discomfort have begun to run high in New Delhi about its impact on India’s Tamil population of southern states, especially Tamil Nadu.
In Tamil Nadu parties on both sides of political divide and organisations of civil society joined by artists, intellectuals, writers and human rights activists have loudly protested against what they allege the violations of human rights of the Sri Lankan Tamils by the Sri Lankan armed forces and the failure of the Union Government to restrain Colombo from causing hardships to the civilians in the Tamil controlled areas. Although both India and Sri Lanka are trying their best to avoid any crisis that may erupt between them as in the past, the latest phase of ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka is bound to have serious repercussions on their bilateral relations.
Although LTTE has been declared a terrorist organisation and banned in more than thirty countries, including India, the outfit continues to enjoy support and sympathy in Tamil Nadu where it used to operate bases for recruitment and training of cadre and collected vast sums of money. Following LTTE’s hand in the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi while he was touring the state for Lok Sabha elections in May 1991, India banned the militant organisation but groundswells of its support and supplies have not dried up in the state.
Common ethnic links continue to bind the Indian and Sri Lankan Tamils together and the current outburst of protest in Tamil Nadu shows how close and immediate affect can the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka have on politics in Tamil Nadu lying across a narrow stretch of water from the Tamil dominated northern part of Sri Lanka. Majority of the state political parties have reacted strongly against the on-going military operation against LTTE, although the Congress, AIDMK and CPI-M maintain their opposition to the terrorist tactics of LTTE. But the wave of anger sweeping across the state has forced other political parties, including Chief Minister M Karunanidhi’s DMK to take a position calling for immediate stoppage of the military operation in Sri Lanka and allow free access to the Sri Lankan Tamil community to humanitarian assistance sent from India and other sources.
In order to put pressure on the government of PM Manmohan Singh to intervene and persuade the government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa to halt military operation against LTTE, an all-party meeting was held in Chennai on October 14. A resolution passed at the meeting asked all the members of Parliament from Tamil Nadu to resign from their seats if the Union Government did not come forward to ensure a ceasefire in Sri Lanka within two weeks after the passage of the resolution. Tamil Nadu sends 39 members to Lok Sabha. Had the threat been Read the rest of this entry »

Sharing a smoke with new found friends by the Li River, Guilin, China

Wisdom in a Nutshell

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
--Sir Winston Churchill

Injustice lies as often in the omission as comission.
-- Marcus Aurelius

... the 20th century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: The growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.
--Alex Carey, Australian social scientist

“the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.”
— Samuel P. Huntington

Readers

  • 277,081 since 8 Dec 06

Visitors by IP Address